If You're Going To Forge An Email By Mark Zuckerberg, Make Sure You Use Proper English

We've already mentioned that Facebook is claiming that the email evidence presented by Paul Ceglia for his claim that he should own a huge chunk of Facebook was a fraud. Time's Techland blog digs a little deeper into the filing and highlights the research of a linguistics expert Facebook hired to compare known emails from Zuckerberg at the time, with the emails Ceglia presented as Zuckerberg's, suggesting that Ceglia's versions do not match Zuckerberg's standard email writing style. Most interesting? The emails Ceglia presented as evidence show a much less formal writing style, whereas Zuckerberg's emails use proper punctuation:

Apostrophes

A) Questionable Zuckerberg writes:

"doesnt," "parents" (parents'), "sites" (site's = contraction for “site is”), and "sites" (site's = possessive)

B) Real Zuckerberg's contractions and possessives are all used correctly. So there's that.

Suspension Points

A) Questionable Zuckerberg writes:

“. . . I've been tweaking the search engine today,” with spaces in between his suspension points.

B) Real Zuckerberg doesn't space out his suspension points. For example: “So let me know…”

Spelling

A) Questionable Zuckerberg writes these words as follows:

“back end” (two words), “internet” (lower case “I”), and “can not” (two words)

B) Real Zuckerberg writes:

“backend” (one word), “Internet” (capital “i”), and “cannot” (one word)

The link has some more examples as well, but this is certainly fascinating. Obviously, this is from Facebook's hired expert, but it does make you realize just how much people have specific language "tics" in how they write, and how difficult it is to fake that, sometimes.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story